I once watched a new slab crack in weeks. I felt stuck. Choices looked messy. I now use a simple path. I match fiber to job, mix, and risk.
I choose fiber by goal first. I write the performance I need. I match it to a fiber family. I check standards, dosage, and supplier proof. I confirm finish, pump, and cost. I then lock the spec and test a batch.

I will guide you step by step. I will share the checks that saved my jobs. I will keep the steps clear. You can copy this today.
What job must the fiber do?
I once picked by habit and lost money. The slab curled and cracked. I now start with the job. I tie the choice to a clear, measured result.
I map problems to outcomes. I pick fibers that deliver that outcome. I define how we will measure it. I then test a small batch and confirm workability.

Common goals
I write the real goal in plain words. I do not start with a brand. I keep the list short and testable.
Quick match table
| Goal / Problem | Best First Pick | Typical Length | Typical Dosage* | Example Uses | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plastic shrinkage cracks | Micro PP monofilament | 6–12 mm | 0.6–1.0 kg/m³ | Slabs-on-grade, toppings | 
| Joint count reduction / crack control after set | Macro synthetic PP | 40–60 mm | 3–6 kg/m³ | Industrial floors, pavements | 
| Structural residual strength | Hooked steel fiber | 30–60 mm | 20–40 kg/m³ | Heavy-duty slabs, precast | 
| Chloride or marine durability | Basalt / AR-glass / PVA | 12–36 mm | See data sheet | Marine, repair mortars | 
| Impact and abrasion | Steel or macro PP | 40–60 mm | Per design | Loading bays, tunnels | 
*I confirm dosage with the supplier test data for my mix and code path. I do not skip this step.
Which fiber type fits my mix and structure?
I once chose a strong fiber that would not pump. The crew fought the mix. I now check mix, placing, finish, and cover. The right pick must fit the method.
I list the fiber families. I note the pros and limits in plain words. I map them to my mix and crew tools. I then shortlist two options.

Fiber families at a glance
| Fiber Type | What I get | What I watch | 
|---|---|---|
| Micro PP (monofilament/fibrillated) | Control of plastic shrinkage. Safer finish. No rust. | Low structural gain. Light dosage only. | 
| Macro Synthetic PP | Residual flexural strength. Lower joint count. Corrosion-free. | Slump drop. Need finishing plan and proper dosage. | 
| Hooked Steel | High residual strength and toughness. Proven for heavy loads. | Corrosion risk if cover is thin. Magnetic tools can help cleanup. | 
| PVA | Tight crack control. Good bond in repair mortars. | Higher cost. Mix must suit. Finish can feel sticky. | 
| AR-Glass | Alkali-resistant for cement. Good for thin sections and render. | Must be AR grade. Do not use standard glass. | 
| Basalt | Heat and chemical resistance. Stable in many mixes. | Supply variance. I ask for test data on my cement. | 
Fit with methods
- Pumping: I keep fibers under the limits the pump allows. I test with my supplier.
 - Finishing: I plan the bull float and trowel timing. I keep trial panels on site.
 - Cover and exposure: I check chloride class, freeze-thaw, and fire needs. I pick the safe fiber for the class.
 
How much fiber should I add and what length works?
I once used the right fiber and the wrong dose. The floor curled and joints failed. I now size by slab depth, panel size, and loads.
I start with the supplier design tables. I pick a length that matches slab depth and joint spacing. I pick a dose that meets the residual strength target. I always trial the mix.

Sizing and dosage rules I use
Length choice
| Slab / Element | My Go-To Length | 
|---|---|
| Thin toppings (20–50 mm) | Micro PP 6–12 mm or PVA 12–24 mm | 
| Typical slabs (120–200 mm) | Macro PP 40–60 mm or steel 35–50 mm | 
| Heavy-duty / thick sections | Steel 50–60 mm or macro PP 50–60 mm | 
Dosage starting points*
*I confirm with ASTM/EN test data and local codes.
| Fiber | Start Dosage | Target Metric | 
|---|---|---|
| Micro PP | 0.6–1.0 kg/m³ | Lower plastic shrinkage cracks | 
| Macro PP | 3–6 kg/m³ | Residual flexural strength per EN 14651/ASTM C1609 | 
| Hooked Steel | 20–40 kg/m³ | Residual strength class (R-values) | 
| PVA / AR-Glass / Basalt | Per data sheet | Crack width, durability class | 
Mixing and placing
- I add fibers slowly into a wet, moving mix.
 - I extend mixing time as the supplier says.
 - I watch slump and add superplasticizer, not water.
 - I mock a panel and confirm finish and saw-cut window.
 
How do I prove performance and manage risk?
I once trusted a brochure and skipped tests. That job came back. I now prove the design on paper and on site. I make risk visible and shared.
I ask for test reports that match my mix and code path. I design the floor with residual strength, not hope. I run a site trial and record results. I keep photos and batches.

Design and test checklist
Paper checks
| Item | What I ask for | Why it helps | 
|---|---|---|
| Data sheet + SDS | Fiber type, length, aspect ratio, melt point, safety | Clear spec and safe handling | 
| Third-party tests | ASTM C1609 or EN 14651 residual strength curves | Real design inputs | 
| Durability data | Shrinkage reduction, freeze-thaw, chloride tests | Fit for exposure class | 
| Approvals | CE/UKCA/ISO/DoP where needed | Compliance proof | 
Design notes
- I set a residual strength target with my designer.
 - I pick joint spacing and panel size that the fiber can carry.
 - I model load cases for racking, wheel loads, and impact.
 - I align saw-cut timing with finish plan.
 
Site controls
| Control | What I do | 
|---|---|
| Trial panel | I pour a small panel. I test finish, saw-cut, and edges. | 
| Batch records | I log fiber weight per truck and mixing time. | 
| QA tests | I run flexural beams where the spec needs them. | 
| Finish plan | I brief the crew on timing, pans, and blades. | 
How do I balance cost and value?
I once bought the cheapest bag. The slab cost more later. I now count total cost, not price per kilo. I compare life and risk, not only strength.
I build a small scorecard. I weigh cost, performance, crew time, and warranty risk. I choose the best value, not the lowest tag. I share the math with my client.

My simple scorecard
| Factor | Weight | Option A (Macro PP) | Option B (Steel) | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Residual strength for loads | 30% | 8/10 | 9/10 | 
| Durability in chloride areas | 20% | 9/10 | 6/10 | 
| Finish and pump ease | 20% | 7/10 | 6/10 | 
| Material + labor cost | 20% | 7/10 | 6/10 | 
| Supplier support | 10% | 8/10 | 8/10 | 
| Weighted score | 100% | 8.0 | 7.2 | 
I adjust the weights to fit the job. I write the reason for each score. I keep this with the spec.
Conclusion
I choose fiber by job, mix, and risk. I prove it on paper and on site. I then build with calm.